The wearing of a ring on the left hand, whether it is a simple gold band or an ornate diamond, is a widely accepted custom in many cultures to indicate that one is legally married. Â The absence of a ring has been generally accepted as indication that one is not married, or to go farther, available to pursue a rom
antic relationship.  Let’s not forget the engagement ring to announce that one intends to marry in the very near future, the promise ring to convey that one is commitment to a monogamous relationship, and there is even the recently popularized purity ring to signify a pledge to sexual abstinence until married.  Now, the latest trend… a divorce ring? Â
The New York Times recently ran a piece revealing this unusual trend. The ring is usually designed to have a gap to signify a separation. You can buy yourself a brand new divorce ring from D –Jewelry Company or have your old wedding ring reconfigured into a divorce ring at your neighborhood jewelry store. I guess its better then the wedding ring coffin put out by Jist Enterprises, LLC, thou
gh not quite as amusing. Â
I understand that divorce is a big deal, but do we really need a divorce ring? Can’t the absence of a ring be enough?  Do we have to announce everything in our lives?  What next a break up ring?  Personally, I think its just another clever marketing scam to sell consumers something they don’t really need. Â
What do you think, is the divorce ring fashion or just another passing fad?
© 2010 Kiki Dahlke





Comments: 3